Sunday, March 25, 2007

After contact with Sue she said that its up to us how we choose to elevated the articles. The aim of the assignment is for us to read the assignment information and interpret it how we see fit. It was explained to me that its not high school anymore & this is part of learning. Sorry this doesn't really help.

3 comments:

stuart said...

Good on ya Nici, I see this as quite helpful because, provided we write a properly referenced 1500word evaluation with a title page, contents page and headings, we can't go too wrong. In other words, there is more than one interpretation on how we go about it.

Part of the assessment is based on our ability respond to the feedback on our draft, so even if the draft is horribly wrong, you could still do fine in the assessment provided you address the concerns.

Luke K said...

Thanks Nici!! well done for taking the initiative for sending the email. Although the response is not exactly what we may have expected it is something to go on as Stuart has pointed out. Thursday's review of drafts should give us some good ideas on how to go about touching up the final copy no matter how we have tackled the draft.
Cheers :)

Karen Harris said...

true team player nici. Thanks so much for your efforts!!